FGFI
Price
$19.00
Change
+$1.25 (+7.04%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MBWM
Price
$43.52
Change
-$1.26 (-2.81%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
605.34M
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGFI vs MBWM

Header iconFGFI vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts FGFI vs MBWMBanner chart's image
First Greenwich Financial
Price$19.00
Change+$1.25 (+7.04%)
Volume$1.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Mercantile Bank
Price$43.52
Change-$1.26 (-2.81%)
Volume$101.49K
Capitalization605.34M
FGFI vs MBWM Comparison Chart
Loading...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGFI vs. MBWM commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFI is a Hold and MBWM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FGFI: $19.00 vs. MBWM: $43.52)
Brand notoriety: FGFI and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGFI: 49% vs. MBWM: 185%
Market capitalization -- FGFI: $0 vs. MBWM: $605.34M
FGFI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $605.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGFI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FGFI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FGFI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FGFI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.26% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGFI YTD gains are higher at: 11.765 vs. MBWM (-0.535). FGFI has less debt than MBWM: FGFI (38.8M) vs MBWM (607M).
FGFIMBWMFGFI / MBWM
CapitalizationN/A605M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.765-0.535-2,198%
P/E RatioN/A7.32-
RevenueN/A226M-
Total CashN/A64.6M-
Total Debt38.8M607M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNG16.360.29
+1.80%
United States Natural Gas
BSJQ23.30-0.02
-0.11%
Invesco BulletShares 2026 HY Corp Bd ETF
ESGD89.08-1.14
-1.26%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
MMSC19.71-0.29
-1.46%
First Trust Multi-Manager Sm Cp Opps ETF
TUR30.75-0.82
-2.60%
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF

FGFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFI and TRCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFI and TRCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGFI
1D Price
Change %
FGFI100%
N/A
TRCY - FGFI
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBBC - FGFI
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBWM - FGFI
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
PSBQ - FGFI
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
WNEB - FGFI
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-2.80%
PEBO - MBWM
91%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
TCBK - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-2.97%
CTBI - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
FBK - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
THFF - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-2.97%
More