FGFH
Price
$44.49
Change
+$10.74 (+31.82%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
160.44M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INFT
Price
$14.50
Change
-$0.50 (-3.33%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
42.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGFH vs INFT

Header iconFGFH vs INFT Comparison
Open Charts FGFH vs INFTBanner chart's image
Foresight Financial Group
Price$44.49
Change+$10.74 (+31.82%)
Volume$744
Capitalization160.44M
Infinity Ban
Price$14.50
Change-$0.50 (-3.33%)
Volume$110
Capitalization42.89M
FGFH vs INFT Comparison Chart in %
FGFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGFH vs. INFT commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFH is a Hold and INFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FGFH: $44.49 vs. INFT: $13.70)
Brand notoriety: FGFH and INFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGFH: 20% vs. INFT: 45%
Market capitalization -- FGFH: $160.44M vs. INFT: $42.89M
FGFH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $160.44M. INFT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $42.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINFT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FGFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INFT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, INFT is a better buy in the long-term than FGFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGFH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGFH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INFT is a better buy in the short-term than FGFH.

Price Growth

FGFH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while INFT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGFH($160M) has a higher market cap than INFT($42.9M). FGFH has higher P/E ratio than INFT: FGFH (20.50) vs INFT (10.62). FGFH YTD gains are higher at: 6.486 vs. INFT (-0.380). INFT has less debt than FGFH: INFT (3.98M) vs FGFH (37.7M). FGFH has higher revenues than INFT: FGFH (57M) vs INFT (16.2M).
FGFHINFTFGFH / INFT
Capitalization160M42.9M373%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.486-0.380-1,706%
P/E Ratio20.5010.62193%
Revenue57M16.2M352%
Total Cash28MN/A-
Total Debt37.7M3.98M947%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGFH vs INFT: Fundamental Ratings
FGFH
INFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3324
SMR RATING
1..100
5453
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INFT's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGFH (77). This means that INFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (33). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (54). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

FGFH's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as INFT (55). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to INFT’s over the last 12 months.

FGFH's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as INFT (23). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to INFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGFHINFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
51%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNPMF0.640.01
+1.36%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
NSANF2.38N/A
N/A
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
VTEPF0.19N/A
N/A
VIDENDUM PLC
SEUSF0.32-0.01
-1.91%
Sintana Energy, Inc.
PFFVF190.00-10.00
-5.00%
Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG

FGFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFH and MVLY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFH and MVLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGFH
1D Price
Change %
FGFH100%
N/A
MVLY - FGFH
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VWFB - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
INFT - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBK - FGFH
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
More

INFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INFT and FIEB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INFT and FIEB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INFT
1D Price
Change %
INFT100%
N/A
FIEB - INFT
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUN - INFT
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
BKUTK - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
FGFH - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLC - INFT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More