FGFH
Price
$31.08
Change
-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
92.62M
INFT
Price
$11.60
Change
+$0.05 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
31.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGFH vs INFT

Header iconFGFH vs INFT Comparison
Open Charts FGFH vs INFTBanner chart's image
Foresight Financial Group
Price$31.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$350
Capitalization92.62M
Infinity Ban
Price$11.60
Change+$0.05 (+0.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization31.1M
FGFH vs INFT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGFH vs. INFT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFH is a Hold and INFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FGFH: $31.08 vs. INFT: $11.60)
Brand notoriety: FGFH and INFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGFH: 19% vs. INFT: 16%
Market capitalization -- FGFH: $92.62M vs. INFT: $31.1M
FGFH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $92.62M. INFT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $31.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGFH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINFT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, INFT is a better buy in the long-term than FGFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGFH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INFT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGFH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • INFT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FGFH and INFT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FGFH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while INFT (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGFH($92.6M) has a higher market cap than INFT($31.1M). INFT has higher P/E ratio than FGFH: INFT (10.38) vs FGFH (6.83). INFT YTD gains are higher at: 23.372 vs. FGFH (-4.620). FGFH has higher revenues than INFT: FGFH (54.1M) vs INFT (9.24M).
FGFHINFTFGFH / INFT
Capitalization92.6M31.1M298%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.62023.372-20%
P/E Ratio6.8310.3866%
Revenue54.1M9.24M585%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt17MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGFH vs INFT: Fundamental Ratings
FGFH
INFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5929
SMR RATING
1..100
4658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5326
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGFH's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INFT (67). This means that FGFH’s stock grew somewhat faster than INFT’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (59). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

FGFH's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as INFT (58). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to INFT’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (59). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (53). This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGFHINFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
9%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FYMNF0.07N/A
N/A
Finlay Minerals Ltd
PTGIF0.08N/A
N/A
Medco Energi Internasional TBK PT
KRMKF0.06N/A
N/A
KROMEK GROUP PLC
FPRUF65.08N/A
N/A
Fraport AG
CLLNY19.55-0.28
-1.41%
Cellnex Telecom SA

FGFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFH and BXRBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFH and BXRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGFH
1D Price
Change %
FGFH100%
-0.06%
BXRBF - FGFH
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUGBY - FGFH
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBK - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
INFT - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
SLBK - FGFH
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

INFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INFT and FIEB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INFT and FIEB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INFT
1D Price
Change %
INFT100%
+0.43%
FIEB - INFT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCTF - INFT
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
FSUN - INFT
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
BKUTK - INFT
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
RSNHF - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More