Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFCX vs VFWPX
FGFCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFCX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes International Leaders C
Price$42.02
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.39
Change+$13.31 (+8.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
FGFCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. FGFCX (1.66B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFCX: VFWPX (2.93) vs FGFCX (1.58). FGFCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFCX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). FGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.29 vs. FGFCX (27.96). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.77 vs. FGFCX (13.72).
| FGFCX | VFWPX | FGFCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.03 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.03 | 6,600% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.876 | 6.471 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 78.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 2.93 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.96 | 34.29 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.93 | 47.98 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.72 | 34.77 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.18 | 110.45 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement