FGF
Price
$16.01
Change
-$0.70 (-4.19%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
40M
IGIC
Price
$24.06
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jun 30, 10:35 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
611.87M
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGF vs IGIC

Header iconFGF vs IGIC Comparison
Open Charts FGF vs IGICBanner chart's image
Fundamental Global
Price$16.01
Change-$0.70 (-4.19%)
Volume$33.58K
Capitalization40M
International General Insurance Holdings
Price$24.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$100
Capitalization611.87M
FGF vs IGIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGF vs. IGIC commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGF is a Buy and IGIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FGF: $16.01 vs. IGIC: $24.05)
Brand notoriety: FGF and IGIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGF: 1284% vs. IGIC: 84%
Market capitalization -- FGF: $40M vs. IGIC: $611.87M
FGF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $40M. IGIC’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $611.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIGIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IGIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGIC is a better buy in the long-term than FGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IGIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IGIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IGIC is a better buy in the short-term than FGF.

Price Growth

FGF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -9.80% price change this week, while IGIC (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +9.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

IGIC is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.79% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IGIC($612M) has a higher market cap than FGF($40M). FGF has higher P/E ratio than IGIC: FGF (6.71) vs IGIC (6.12). IGIC YTD gains are higher at: 4.968 vs. FGF (-26.560). FGF has less debt than IGIC: FGF (387K) vs IGIC (3.07M). IGIC has higher revenues than FGF: IGIC (491M) vs FGF (23.7M).
FGFIGICFGF / IGIC
Capitalization40M612M7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-26.5604.968-535%
P/E Ratio6.716.12110%
Revenue23.7M491M5%
Total Cash2.4MN/A-
Total Debt387K3.07M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGF vs IGIC: Fundamental Ratings
FGF
IGIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
9445
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IGIC's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FGF (84) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IGIC’s stock grew similarly to FGF’s over the last 12 months.

IGIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGF (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IGIC’s stock grew significantly faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

IGIC's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGF (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IGIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

IGIC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGF (81) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IGIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

IGIC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGF (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IGIC’s stock grew significantly faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGFIGIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BXSL31.34-0.17
-0.54%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
CDRE32.03-0.24
-0.74%
Cadre Holdings
MU124.76-1.24
-0.98%
Micron Technology
EDAP1.67-0.05
-2.62%
EDAP TMS SA
NCSM29.74-1.31
-4.22%
NCS Multistage Holdings

FGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGF and FIHL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGF and FIHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGF
1D Price
Change %
FGF100%
-6.37%
FIHL - FGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
ESGR - FGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGIC - FGF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
ORI - FGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
SLF - FGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More

IGIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGIC has been loosely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IGIC jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGIC
1D Price
Change %
IGIC100%
+1.52%
ORI - IGIC
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
FIHL - IGIC
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
EQH - IGIC
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
AIG - IGIC
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
GSHD - IGIC
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.79%
More