Advertisement
FGETF
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FGETF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- FGETF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
FGETF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.37%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (+2.58% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
| FGETF | |
| Capitalization | 2.1B |
| EBITDA | 416M |
| Gain YTD | -43.909 |
| P/E Ratio | 24.95 |
| Revenue | 2.78B |
| Total Cash | 835M |
| Total Debt | 884M |
FGETF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FGETF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ARIDX | 6.28 | 0.05 | +0.80% |
| AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value I | |||
| TROZX | 24.10 | 0.13 | +0.54% |
| T. Rowe Price International Value Eq Z | |||
| PGLEX | 20.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Putnam Focused International Equity R6 | |||
| GERAX | 11.26 | -0.04 | -0.35% |
| Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts A | |||
| HSLCX | 41.98 | -2.96 | -6.59% |
| Hartford Small Cap Growth C | |||
FGETF and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGETF and HWGG have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGETF and HWGG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGETF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGETF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HWGG - FGETF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WW - FGETF | 2% Poorly correlated | +4.75% | ||
| TCOM - FGETF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| CTMLF - FGETF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GDDFF - FGETF | 0% Poorly correlated | +3.42% | ||
More | ||||