Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGEMX vs GTCCX
FGEMX vs GTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FGEMX vs GTCCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesM
Price$138.02
Change+$0.25 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
Gabelli Global Content & Connect C
Price$29.39
Change-$0.08 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.74M
FGEMX vs GTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGEMX vs. GTCCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGEMX is a Buy and GTCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGEMX has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. GTCCX (80.7M). GTCCX pays higher dividends than FGEMX: GTCCX (2.13) vs FGEMX (0.00). FGEMX was incepted earlier than GTCCX: FGEMX (7 years) vs GTCCX (25 years). GTCCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than FGEMX (1.21). FGEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GTCCX (4.00). FGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTCCX: FGEMX (0) vs GTCCX (1000). GTCCX (33.60) and FGEMX (32.88) have marching annual gain over last year. FGEMX return over 5 years is better than : 89.48 vs. GTCCX (61.32).
| FGEMX | GTCCX | FGEMX / GTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.90 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.52 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.572 | 37.465 | 74% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 80.7M | 3,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.88 | 33.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 142.82 | 109.39 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.48 | 61.32 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement