Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDTX vs OGMNX
FGDTX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGDTX vs OGMNX
Fidelity Advisor Gold M
Price$44.49
Change+$1.08 (+2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$44.43
Change+$0.64 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.39B
FGDTX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDTX vs. OGMNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDTX is a Buy and OGMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 3.39B vs. FGDTX (2.85B). FGDTX pays higher dividends than OGMNX: FGDTX (1.75) vs OGMNX (0.48). FGDTX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: FGDTX (19 years) vs OGMNX (25 years). OGMNX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGDTX (1.22). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FGDTX (17.00). FGDTX has a lower initial minimum investment than OGMNX: FGDTX (0) vs OGMNX (1000). FGDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 82.17 vs. OGMNX (77.57). OGMNX return over 5 years is better than : 66.18 vs. FGDTX (51.78).
| FGDTX | OGMNX | FGDTX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.36 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.36 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 92.348 | 80.652 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 3.39B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 0.48 | 364% |
| Returns for 1 year | 82.17 | 77.57 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 165.34 | 161.99 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.78 | 66.18 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 277.69 | 418.57 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers