Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGEBX
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Growth Discovery K
Price$68.81
Change+$0.17 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.43B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.63
Change+$0.33 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FGDKX (6.43B). FGDKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FGDKX (0.24) vs RGEBX (0.00). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGDKX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FGDKX (0.58). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FGDKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. FGDKX (10.14). FGDKX (45.51) and RGEBX (44.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGDKX | RGEBX | FGDKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.639 | 17.063 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.43B | 337B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.14 | 12.00 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.17 | 70.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.51 | 44.30 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.34 | 106.30 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers