Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs OGMNX
FGDCX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs OGMNX
Fidelity Advisor Gold C
Price$34.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$35.56
Change+$0.18 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.74B
FGDCX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. OGMNX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a StrongBuy and OGMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 2.74B vs. FGDCX (2.36B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than OGMNX: FGDCX (1.69) vs OGMNX (0.57). FGDCX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: FGDCX (19 years) vs OGMNX (24 years). FGDCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than OGMNX (1.36). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FGDCX (17.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OGMNX: FGDCX (0) vs OGMNX (1000). FGDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.63 vs. OGMNX (47.65). OGMNX return over 5 years is better than : 54.24 vs. FGDCX (35.79).
| FGDCX | OGMNX | FGDCX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.36 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.36 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 56.762 | 46.700 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 2.74B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.57 | 296% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.63 | 47.65 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.29 | 86.78 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.79 | 54.24 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.06 | 239.51 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers