Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs OGMNX
FGDCX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs OGMNX
Fidelity Advisor Gold C
Price$36.78
Change+$0.23 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$38.98
Change+$0.49 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.01B
FGDCX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. OGMNX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and OGMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 3.01B vs. FGDCX (2.33B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than OGMNX: FGDCX (1.72) vs OGMNX (0.58). FGDCX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: FGDCX (19 years) vs OGMNX (24 years). FGDCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than OGMNX (1.36). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FGDCX (17.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OGMNX: FGDCX (0) vs OGMNX (1000). FGDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.66 vs. OGMNX (56.68). OGMNX return over 5 years is better than : 52.13 vs. FGDCX (32.35).
| FGDCX | OGMNX | FGDCX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.36 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.36 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 69.181 | 60.809 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 3.01B | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.58 | 296% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.66 | 56.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.27 | 102.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.35 | 52.13 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.69 | 332.95 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers