Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs OGMNX
FGDCX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs OGMNX
Fidelity Advisor Gold C
Price$35.22
Change+$0.61 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$36.78
Change+$0.69 (+1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.83B
FGDCX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. OGMNX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Buy and OGMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 2.83B vs. FGDCX (2.24B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than OGMNX: FGDCX (1.75) vs OGMNX (0.57). FGDCX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: FGDCX (19 years) vs OGMNX (24 years). FGDCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than OGMNX (1.36). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FGDCX (17.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OGMNX: FGDCX (0) vs OGMNX (1000). FGDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 73.45 vs. OGMNX (60.93). OGMNX return over 5 years is better than : 80.25 vs. FGDCX (54.93).
| FGDCX | OGMNX | FGDCX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.36 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.36 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 62.006 | 51.733 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 2.83B | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 0.57 | 305% |
| Returns for 1 year | 73.45 | 60.93 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.44 | 77.06 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.93 | 80.25 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.28 | 241.35 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers