Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDAX vs OGMNX
FGDAX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGDAX vs OGMNX
Fidelity Advisor Gold A
Price$45.73
Change+$1.11 (+2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$43.79
Change+$1.04 (+2.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.39B
FGDAX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDAX vs. OGMNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDAX is a Buy and OGMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 3.39B vs. FGDAX (2.85B). FGDAX pays higher dividends than OGMNX: FGDAX (1.83) vs OGMNX (0.48). FGDAX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: FGDAX (19 years) vs OGMNX (25 years). OGMNX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGDAX (0.97). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FGDAX (17.00). FGDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OGMNX: FGDAX (0) vs OGMNX (1000). FGDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 82.65 vs. OGMNX (77.57). OGMNX return over 5 years is better than : 66.18 vs. FGDAX (53.77).
| FGDAX | OGMNX | FGDAX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.36 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.36 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 92.628 | 80.652 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 3.39B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 0.48 | 380% |
| Returns for 1 year | 82.65 | 77.57 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 167.23 | 161.99 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.77 | 66.18 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 285.73 | 418.57 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers