Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDAX vs OGMNX
FGDAX vs OGMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGDAX vs OGMNX
Fidelity Advisor Gold A
Price$37.97
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
Price$35.90
Change+$0.16 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
FGDAX vs OGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDAX vs. OGMNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDAX is a Buy and OGMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OGMNX has more cash in the bank: 2.77B vs. FGDAX (2.36B). FGDAX pays higher dividends than OGMNX: FGDAX (2.16) vs OGMNX (0.57). FGDAX was incepted earlier than OGMNX: FGDAX (19 years) vs OGMNX (24 years). OGMNX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGDAX (0.97). OGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FGDAX (17.00). FGDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OGMNX: FGDAX (0) vs OGMNX (1000). FGDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.90 vs. OGMNX (47.30). OGMNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.30 vs. FGDAX (25.07).
| FGDAX | OGMNX | FGDAX / OGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.36 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.36 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 59.941 | 48.102 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 2.77B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 0.57 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.90 | 47.30 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 111.31 | 106.86 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.07 | 38.30 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 226.76 | 325.57 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement