FGBI
Price
$7.78
Change
-$0.10 (-1.27%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
117.63M
30 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$23.58
Change
+$0.23 (+0.99%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
21.04B
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGBI vs RF

Header iconFGBI vs RF Comparison
Open Charts FGBI vs RFBanner chart's image
First Guaranty Bancshares
Price$7.78
Change-$0.10 (-1.27%)
Volume$17.7K
Capitalization117.63M
Regions Financial
Price$23.58
Change+$0.23 (+0.99%)
Volume$47.52M
Capitalization21.04B
FGBI vs RF Comparison Chart in %
FGBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGBI vs. RF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBI is a Hold and RF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FGBI: $7.78 vs. RF: $23.58)
Brand notoriety: FGBI: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGBI: 212% vs. RF: 217%
Market capitalization -- FGBI: $117.63M vs. RF: $21.04B
FGBI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $117.63M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $21.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGBI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGBI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than FGBI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGBI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGBI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than FGBI.

Price Growth

FGBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -12.58% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FGBI is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($21B) has a higher market cap than FGBI($118M). FGBI has higher P/E ratio than RF: FGBI (61.92) vs RF (10.39). RF YTD gains are higher at: 3.520 vs. FGBI (-31.257). RF has more cash in the bank: 3.25B vs. FGBI (363M). FGBI has less debt than RF: FGBI (179M) vs RF (5.28B). RF has higher revenues than FGBI: RF (7.29B) vs FGBI (99.4M).
FGBIRFFGBI / RF
Capitalization118M21B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-31.2573.520-888%
P/E Ratio61.9210.39596%
Revenue99.4M7.29B1%
Total Cash363M3.25B11%
Total Debt179M5.28B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGBI vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
FGBI
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7064
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
877
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
376
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (69) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGBI (87) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

FGBI's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for RF (76) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FGBI’s stock grew significantly faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGBIRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLVYY3.23N/A
+0.11%
Solvay S.A.
CYAN0.29N/A
N/A
Cyanotech Corp.
CKISY31.27N/A
N/A
CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited
LUMB13.50N/A
N/A
Lumbee Guaranty Bank
SGLFF3.94N/A
N/A
Sgl Group

FGBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGBI has been loosely correlated with CZWI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGBI jumps, then CZWI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGBI
1D Price
Change %
FGBI100%
-1.27%
CZWI - FGBI
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
HIFS - FGBI
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
FUNC - FGBI
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
FCCO - FGBI
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
RF - FGBI
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.99%
FITB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
HBAN - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
MTB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
FNB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
CFG - RF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
More