FG
Price
$27.70
Change
-$1.97 (-6.64%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.73B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNM
Price
$76.56
Change
-$0.21 (-0.27%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.81B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FG vs UNM

Header iconFG vs UNM Comparison
Open Charts FG vs UNMBanner chart's image
F&G Annuities & Life
Price$27.70
Change-$1.97 (-6.64%)
Volume$724.2K
Capitalization3.73B
Unum Group
Price$76.56
Change-$0.21 (-0.27%)
Volume$1.2M
Capitalization12.81B
FG vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
FG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FG vs. UNM commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FG is a Buy and UNM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FG: $27.70 vs. UNM: $76.56)
Brand notoriety: FG and UNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FG: 97% vs. UNM: 88%
Market capitalization -- FG: $3.73B vs. UNM: $12.81B
FG [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.73B. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $12.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $177.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $28.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the long-term than FG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the short-term than FG.

Price Growth

FG (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

FG is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

UNM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.79% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNM($12.8B) has a higher market cap than FG($3.73B). UNM has higher P/E ratio than FG: UNM (14.81) vs FG (8.05). UNM YTD gains are higher at: -0.614 vs. FG (-10.211). FG has less debt than UNM: FG (2.24B) vs UNM (3.75B). UNM has higher revenues than FG: UNM (13B) vs FG (5.23B).
FGUNMFG / UNM
Capitalization3.73B12.8B29%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.211-0.6141,664%
P/E Ratio8.0514.8154%
Revenue5.23B13B40%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.24B3.75B60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FG vs UNM: Fundamental Ratings
FG
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
516
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
70n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FG's Valuation (20) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (42). This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FG (51). This means that UNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FG’s over the last 12 months.

FG's SMR Rating (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (95). This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FG (62). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to FG’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FG (54). This means that UNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPD25.440.12
+0.46%
Global X MLP & Engy Infras Cov Cll ETF
EOT17.530.06
+0.34%
EATON VANCE NATIONAL Municipal OPPORTUNITIES TRUST
SEPM31.94-0.05
-0.15%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Sep
FSCO5.94-0.03
-0.50%
FS Credit Opportunities Corp
KEMQ26.19-0.40
-1.51%
KraneShares Em Mkts Cnsmr Tech ETF

FG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FG has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FG jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FG
1D Price
Change %
FG100%
-6.98%
CNO - FG
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
LNC - FG
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.99%
MET - FG
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
PRU - FG
52%
Loosely correlated
-4.06%
UNM - FG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
+0.12%
CNO - UNM
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
PRI - UNM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
GL - UNM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
MET - UNM
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
AFL - UNM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More