FG
Price
$28.99
Change
-$0.04 (-0.14%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
17 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$78.46
Change
+$0.62 (+0.80%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
52.18B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FG vs MET

Header iconFG vs MET Comparison
Open Charts FG vs METBanner chart's image
F&G Annuities & Life
Price$28.99
Change-$0.04 (-0.14%)
Volume$146.71K
Capitalization3.9B
MetLife
Price$78.46
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
Volume$3.49M
Capitalization52.18B
FG vs MET Comparison Chart in %
FG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FG vs. MET commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FG is a Hold and MET is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FG: $28.99 vs. MET: $78.46)
Brand notoriety: FG: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FG: 86% vs. MET: 109%
Market capitalization -- FG: $3.9B vs. MET: $52.18B
FG [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.9B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $52.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $141.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than FG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the short-term than FG.

Price Growth

FG (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

FG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.43% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($52.2B) has a higher market cap than FG($3.9B). MET has higher P/E ratio than FG: MET (13.32) vs FG (11.55). MET YTD gains are higher at: -2.107 vs. FG (-28.731). FG has less debt than MET: FG (2.24B) vs MET (19.9B). MET has higher revenues than FG: MET (72.1B) vs FG (4.99B).
FGMETFG / MET
Capitalization3.9B52.2B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-28.731-2.1071,363%
P/E Ratio11.5513.3287%
Revenue4.99B72.1B7%
Total CashN/A113B-
Total Debt2.24B19.9B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FG vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
FG
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5685
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4323
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6465

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FG's Valuation (27) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (42). This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FG (43). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to FG’s over the last 12 months.

FG's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FG (84). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to FG’s over the last 12 months.

FG's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (91). This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WANT49.271.20
+2.50%
Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bull 3X ETF
STXG49.870.24
+0.49%
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
NOVP29.920.12
+0.41%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Nov
VOX185.150.70
+0.38%
Vanguard Communication Services ETF
DTCR21.77-0.26
-1.18%
Global X Data Center & Dgtl Infrs ETF

FG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FG has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FG jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FG
1D Price
Change %
FG100%
-0.14%
CNO - FG
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
LNC - FG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
JXN - FG
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
MET - FG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
PRU - FG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+0.80%
PRU - MET
90%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
AFL - MET
86%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
LNC - MET
78%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
PRI - MET
77%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
JXN - MET
76%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
More