FG
Price
$31.90
Change
+$0.23 (+0.73%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.3B
37 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$81.62
Change
+$1.34 (+1.67%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
54.28B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FG vs MET

Header iconFG vs MET Comparison
Open Charts FG vs METBanner chart's image
F&G Annuities & Life
Price$31.90
Change+$0.23 (+0.73%)
Volume$124.36K
Capitalization4.3B
MetLife
Price$81.62
Change+$1.34 (+1.67%)
Volume$2.35M
Capitalization54.28B
FG vs MET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FG vs. MET commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FG is a Buy and MET is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FG: $31.90 vs. MET: $81.62)
Brand notoriety: FG: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FG: 69% vs. MET: 67%
Market capitalization -- FG: $4.3B vs. MET: $54.28B
FG [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $4.3B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $54.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $132.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than FG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the short-term than FG.

Price Growth

FG (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -3.30% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

FG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.62% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($54.3B) has a higher market cap than FG($4.3B). MET has higher P/E ratio than FG: MET (13.86) vs FG (12.71). MET YTD gains are higher at: 1.835 vs. FG (-21.577). FG has less debt than MET: FG (2.24B) vs MET (19.9B).
FGMETFG / MET
Capitalization4.3B54.3B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.5771.835-1,176%
P/E Ratio12.7113.8692%
RevenueN/A72.1B-
Total CashN/A113B-
Total Debt2.24B19.9B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FG vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
FG
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9181
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3823
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8087
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FG's Valuation (32) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (42). This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FG (38). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to FG’s over the last 12 months.

FG's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FG (79). This means that MET’s stock grew somewhat faster than FG’s over the last 12 months.

FG's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (87). This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OILU26.340.63
+2.45%
MicroSectorsTM Oil&Gs Exp&Pd 3X Lvg ETNs
XLI152.581.36
+0.90%
The Industrial Select Sector SPDR® ETF
BHFAL18.23-0.05
-0.30%
Brighthouse Financial
BIT13.31-0.13
-0.97%
BLACKROCK MULTI-SECTOR Income TRUST
FLKR26.55-0.33
-1.23%
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

FG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FG has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FG jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FG
1D Price
Change %
FG100%
+0.73%
CNO - FG
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
MET - FG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
JXN - FG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
PRU - FG
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
UNM - FG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+1.67%
PRU - MET
83%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
CNO - MET
79%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
UNM - MET
78%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
LNC - MET
78%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
PRI - MET
78%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
More