FFXXF
Price
$1.79
Change
+$0.09 (+5.29%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
184.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GMPXF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
224.79M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXXF vs GMPXF

Header iconFFXXF vs GMPXF Comparison
Open Charts FFXXF vs GMPXFBanner chart's image
HELIOS FAIRFAX PARTNERS
Price$1.79
Change+$0.09 (+5.29%)
Volume$2.93K
Capitalization184.1M
RF Capital Group
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization224.79M
FFXXF vs GMPXF Comparison Chart in %
FFXXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GMPXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXXF vs. GMPXF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXXF is a StrongBuy and GMPXF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXXF: $1.79 vs. GMPXF: $14.33)
Brand notoriety: FFXXF and GMPXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXXF: 100% vs. GMPXF: 48%
Market capitalization -- FFXXF: $184.1M vs. GMPXF: $224.79M
FFXXF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $184.1M. GMPXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $224.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGMPXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GMPXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFXXF and GMPXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMPXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GMPXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFXXF is a better buy in the short-term than GMPXF.

Price Growth

FFXXF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.87% price change this week, while GMPXF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.68% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMPXF($225M) has a higher market cap than FFXXF($184M). GMPXF YTD gains are higher at: 178.823 vs. FFXXF (-12.255). FFXXF has less debt than GMPXF: FFXXF (477K) vs GMPXF (130M). GMPXF has higher revenues than FFXXF: GMPXF (377M) vs FFXXF (9.98M).
FFXXFGMPXFFFXXF / GMPXF
Capitalization184M225M82%
EBITDAN/A48.9M-
Gain YTD-12.255178.823-7%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue9.98M377M3%
Total CashN/A86.5M-
Total Debt477K130M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXXF vs GMPXF: Fundamental Ratings
FFXXF
GMPXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
547
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4494
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
18n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMPXF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (79). This means that GMPXF’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMPXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (100). This means that GMPXF’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GMPXF (93). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMPXF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (84). This means that GMPXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMPXF (94). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXXFGMPXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GMPXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAALF0.170.01
+4.01%
IBC Advanced Alloys Corp.
TRYIF6.57N/A
N/A
Toray Industries Inc.
AVSFY22.66N/A
N/A
Avi Ltd.
TVBCY1.00N/A
N/A
Television Broadcasts Ltd.
GCIRX16.98-1.05
-5.82%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts R

FFXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXXF and CNDCF have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXXF and CNDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXXF
1D Price
Change %
FFXXF100%
+5.29%
CNDCF - FFXXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEVIY - FFXXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - FFXXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EQBBF - FFXXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
MGLD - FFXXF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+8.55%
More

GMPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMPXF has been loosely correlated with LBGUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMPXF jumps, then LBGUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMPXF
1D Price
Change %
GMPXF100%
N/A
LBGUF - GMPXF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FGNX - GMPXF
40%
Loosely correlated
-8.23%
RAFI - GMPXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
BBUC - GMPXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
SLFPY - GMPXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More