FFXXF
Price
$2.16
Change
-$0.02 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
294.61M
GMPXF
Price
$8.03
Change
+$1.04 (+14.88%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
216.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXXF vs GMPXF

Header iconFFXXF vs GMPXF Comparison
Open Charts FFXXF vs GMPXFBanner chart's image
HELIOS FAIRFAX PARTNERS
Price$2.16
Change-$0.02 (-0.92%)
Volume$300
Capitalization294.61M
RF Capital Group
Price$8.03
Change+$1.04 (+14.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization216.03M
FFXXF vs GMPXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXXF vs. GMPXF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXXF is a Hold and GMPXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXXF: $2.16 vs. GMPXF: $8.03)
Brand notoriety: FFXXF and GMPXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXXF: 10% vs. GMPXF: 57%
Market capitalization -- FFXXF: $294.61M vs. GMPXF: $216.03M
FFXXF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $294.61M. GMPXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $216.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGMPXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GMPXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMPXF is a better buy in the long-term than FFXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMPXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GMPXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFXXF is a better buy in the short-term than GMPXF.

Price Growth

FFXXF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while GMPXF (@Investment Managers) price change was +30.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXXF($295M) has a higher market cap than GMPXF($216M). GMPXF YTD gains are higher at: 56.226 vs. FFXXF (5.882). FFXXF has less debt than GMPXF: FFXXF (99.4M) vs GMPXF (120M). GMPXF has higher revenues than FFXXF: GMPXF (214M) vs FFXXF (-19.58M).
FFXXFGMPXFFFXXF / GMPXF
Capitalization295M216M137%
EBITDAN/A52.7M-
Gain YTD5.88256.22610%
P/E RatioN/A14.12-
Revenue-19.58M214M-9%
Total CashN/A571M-
Total Debt99.4M120M83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXXF vs GMPXF: Fundamental Ratings
FFXXF
GMPXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5596
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFXXF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as GMPXF (84). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GMPXF (100). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMPXF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (93). This means that GMPXF’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMPXF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (80). This means that GMPXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMPXF (96). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXXFGMPXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEOSX14.720.20
+1.38%
Pear Tree Essex Environmental Opps Ins
LGLIX53.750.69
+1.30%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders I
JSGTX29.920.30
+1.01%
JHancock U.S. Growth R6
AMONX23.810.23
+0.98%
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style N
HOOFX30.480.21
+0.69%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps F

FFXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXXF and FFXDF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXXF and FFXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXXF
1D Price
Change %
FFXXF100%
N/A
FFXDF - FFXXF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
MGLD - FFXXF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMFF - FFXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
FRMO - FFXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
GLAE - FFXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GMPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMPXF and GCAAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMPXF and GCAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMPXF
1D Price
Change %
GMPXF100%
+14.88%
GCAAF - GMPXF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
HALFF - GMPXF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
FRRPF - GMPXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - GMPXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAE - GMPXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More