FFXXF
Price
$2.08
Change
+$0.08 (+4.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
218.75M
GLAE
Price
$30.00
Change
+$5.00 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
755.1K
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXXF vs GLAE

Header iconFFXXF vs GLAE Comparison
Open Charts FFXXF vs GLAEBanner chart's image
HELIOS FAIRFAX PARTNERS
Price$2.08
Change+$0.08 (+4.00%)
Volume$460
Capitalization218.75M
GlassBridge Enterprises
Price$30.00
Change+$5.00 (+20.00%)
Volume$3
Capitalization755.1K
FFXXF vs GLAE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXXF vs. GLAE commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXXF is a Buy and GLAE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXXF: $2.08 vs. GLAE: $30.00)
Brand notoriety: FFXXF and GLAE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXXF: 15% vs. GLAE: 100%
Market capitalization -- FFXXF: $218.75M vs. GLAE: $755.1K
FFXXF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $218.75M. GLAE’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $755.1K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLAE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLAE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFXXF and GLAE are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLAE’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLAE’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAE is a better buy in the short-term than FFXXF.

Price Growth

FFXXF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +9.01% price change this week, while GLAE (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXXF($219M) has a higher market cap than GLAE($755K). FFXXF YTD gains are higher at: 2.059 vs. GLAE (-6.250). FFXXF has less debt than GLAE: FFXXF (477K) vs GLAE (1.9M).
FFXXFGLAEFFXXF / GLAE
Capitalization219M755K29,007%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.059-6.250-33%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue9.98MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt477K1.9M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXXF vs GLAE: Fundamental Ratings
FFXXF
GLAE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFXXF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAE (81). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAE (100). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAE (97). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (62). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (48). This means that GLAE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXXFGLAE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEVA22.730.36
+1.61%
CEVA
KIM22.760.22
+0.98%
Kimco Realty Corp
PMCB0.940.01
+0.78%
PharmaCyte Biotech
CNTB1.75-0.03
-1.69%
Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited
HURN141.27-3.88
-2.67%
Huron Consulting Group

FFXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXXF and FFXDF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXXF and FFXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXXF
1D Price
Change %
FFXXF100%
+3.89%
FFXDF - FFXXF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
MGLD - FFXXF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
AIMFF - FFXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
FRMO - FFXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.82%
GLAE - FFXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GLAE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAE and ICMB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAE and ICMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAE
1D Price
Change %
GLAE100%
N/A
ICMB - GLAE
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
FNNCF - GLAE
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
FRMO - GLAE
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.82%
FFXXF - GLAE
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
HALFF - GLAE
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More