FFXDF
Price
$17.60
Change
-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
WNDLF
Price
$94.81
Change
-$1.03 (-1.07%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXDF vs WNDLF

Header iconFFXDF vs WNDLF Comparison
Open Charts FFXDF vs WNDLFBanner chart's image
Fairfax India
Price$17.60
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Volume$18.72K
Capitalization2.38B
Wendel
Price$94.81
Change-$1.03 (-1.07%)
Volume$18
Capitalization3.99B
FFXDF vs WNDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXDF vs. WNDLF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXDF is a Hold and WNDLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXDF: $17.60 vs. WNDLF: $94.81)
Brand notoriety: FFXDF and WNDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXDF: 88% vs. WNDLF: 38%
Market capitalization -- FFXDF: $2.38B vs. WNDLF: $3.99B
FFXDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.38B. WNDLF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWNDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WNDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFXDF is a better buy in the long-term than WNDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNDLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WNDLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WNDLF is a better buy in the short-term than FFXDF.

Price Growth

FFXDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while WNDLF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WNDLF($3.99B) has a higher market cap than FFXDF($2.38B). FFXDF has higher P/E ratio than WNDLF: FFXDF (35.92) vs WNDLF (12.65). FFXDF YTD gains are higher at: 9.976 vs. WNDLF (-0.862). FFXDF has less debt than WNDLF: FFXDF (499M) vs WNDLF (6.63B). WNDLF has higher revenues than FFXDF: WNDLF (8.36B) vs FFXDF (143M).
FFXDFWNDLFFFXDF / WNDLF
Capitalization2.38B3.99B60%
EBITDAN/A1.71B-
Gain YTD9.976-0.862-1,158%
P/E Ratio35.9212.65284%
Revenue143M8.36B2%
Total CashN/A2.79B-
Total Debt499M6.63B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXDF vs WNDLF: Fundamental Ratings
FFXDF
WNDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
9197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4165

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WNDLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXDF (86). This means that WNDLF’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WNDLF (100). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew significantly faster than WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as WNDLF (97). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as WNDLF (60). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WNDLF (98). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew significantly faster than WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDFWNDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKYU37.520.74
+2.02%
ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing
BUG34.140.49
+1.46%
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
RSSL93.340.48
+0.52%
Global X Russell 2000 ETF
BRLN52.110.03
+0.06%
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF
IQSU51.58-0.12
-0.24%
NYLI Candriam U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and RESCU have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and RESCU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
-0.84%
RESCU - FFXDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - FFXDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - FFXDF
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
MGLD - FFXDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
CNDCF - FFXDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WNDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WNDLF and OFS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WNDLF and OFS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WNDLF
1D Price
Change %
WNDLF100%
N/A
OFS - WNDLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
FFXDF - WNDLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
URNAF - WNDLF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
WNMLA - WNDLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCMG - WNDLF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More