FFXDF
Price
$17.60
Change
-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
RESCU
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXDF vs RESCU

Header iconFFXDF vs RESCU Comparison
Open Charts FFXDF vs RESCUBanner chart's image
Fairfax India
Price$17.60
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Volume$18.72K
Capitalization2.38B
Rescap Liquidating Trust
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
CapitalizationN/A
FFXDF vs RESCU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RESCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXDF vs. RESCU commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXDF is a Hold and RESCU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXDF: $17.60 vs. RESCU: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: FFXDF and RESCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXDF: 88% vs. RESCU: 84%
Market capitalization -- FFXDF: $2.38B vs. RESCU: $0
FFXDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.38B. RESCU’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRESCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RESCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFXDF is a better buy in the long-term than RESCU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RESCU’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RESCU’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFXDF is a better buy in the short-term than RESCU.

Price Growth

FFXDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while RESCU (@Investment Managers) price change was -78.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXDF YTD gains are higher at: 9.976 vs. RESCU (-20.530).
FFXDFRESCUFFXDF / RESCU
Capitalization2.38BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.976-20.530-49%
P/E Ratio35.92N/A-
Revenue143MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt499MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXDF vs RESCU: Fundamental Ratings
FFXDF
RESCU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6096
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RESCU's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXDF (86). This means that RESCU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RESCU (100). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RESCU (96). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDFRESCU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RESCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESTC86.712.00
+2.36%
Elastic NV
ACMR27.410.43
+1.59%
ACM Research
CDRO8.240.12
+1.48%
Codere Online Luxembourg SA
WHLRP4.040.04
+1.00%
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust
HOWL1.35N/A
N/A
Werewolf Therapeutics

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and RESCU have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and RESCU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
-0.84%
RESCU - FFXDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - FFXDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - FFXDF
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
MGLD - FFXDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
CNDCF - FFXDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RESCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RESCU and FFXDF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RESCU and FFXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RESCU
1D Price
Change %
RESCU100%
N/A
FFXDF - RESCU
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
BRDG - RESCU
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGLD - RESCU
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
ASXSF - RESCU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - RESCU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More