FFXDF
Price
$19.05
Change
+$0.39 (+2.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
MGLD
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXDF vs MGLD

Header iconFFXDF vs MGLD Comparison
Open Charts FFXDF vs MGLDBanner chart's image
Fairfax India
Price$19.05
Change+$0.39 (+2.09%)
Volume$12.09K
Capitalization1.96B
Marygold Companies (The)
Price$0.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.86K
Capitalization49.69M
FFXDF vs MGLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXDF vs. MGLD commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXDF is a StrongBuy and MGLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXDF: $19.05 vs. MGLD: $0.78)
Brand notoriety: FFXDF and MGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXDF: 36% vs. MGLD: 48%
Market capitalization -- FFXDF: $1.96B vs. MGLD: $49.69M
FFXDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.96B. MGLD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $49.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFXDF is a better buy in the long-term than MGLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGLD’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGLD’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFXDF is a better buy in the short-term than MGLD.

Price Growth

FFXDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.10% price change this week, while MGLD (@Investment Managers) price change was -14.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXDF($1.96B) has a higher market cap than MGLD($49.7M). MGLD has higher P/E ratio than FFXDF: MGLD (88.83) vs FFXDF (25.45). FFXDF YTD gains are higher at: 19.033 vs. MGLD (-55.682). MGLD has less debt than FFXDF: MGLD (1.73M) vs FFXDF (497M). FFXDF has higher revenues than MGLD: FFXDF (112M) vs MGLD (33.9M).
FFXDFMGLDFFXDF / MGLD
Capitalization1.96B49.7M3,952%
EBITDAN/A-983.96K-
Gain YTD19.033-55.682-34%
P/E Ratio25.4588.8329%
Revenue112M33.9M330%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt497M1.73M28,712%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXDF vs MGLD: Fundamental Ratings
FFXDF
MGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
9095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4489
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGLD's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXDF (83). This means that MGLD’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGLD (100). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MGLD (95). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGLD (89). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

MGLD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXDF (3). This means that MGLD’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDFMGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SITIY34.592.30
+7.12%
SITC International Holdings Company, Ltd.
BWB17.000.25
+1.49%
Bridgewater Bancshares
AN212.500.51
+0.24%
AutoNation
BHVN14.63-0.13
-0.88%
Biohaven Ltd
MOGO2.20-0.37
-14.40%
Mogo

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and RESCU have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and RESCU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
+2.09%
RESCU - FFXDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - FFXDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - FFXDF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGLD - FFXDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDCF - FFXDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGLD and HNNA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGLD and HNNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGLD
1D Price
Change %
MGLD100%
N/A
HNNA - MGLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
RESCU - MGLD
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICMB - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
ALTI - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
DEFG - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More