FFXDF
Price
$18.58
Change
-$0.31 (-1.64%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.43B
FFXXF
Price
$2.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
216.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXDF vs FFXXF

Header iconFFXDF vs FFXXF Comparison
Open Charts FFXDF vs FFXXFBanner chart's image
Fairfax India
Price$18.58
Change-$0.31 (-1.64%)
Volume$10.09K
Capitalization2.43B
HELIOS FAIRFAX PARTNERS
Price$2.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.93K
Capitalization216.58M
FFXDF vs FFXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXDF vs. FFXXF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXDF is a Hold and FFXXF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXDF: $18.58 vs. FFXXF: $2.01)
Brand notoriety: FFXDF and FFXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXDF: 41% vs. FFXXF: 360%
Market capitalization -- FFXDF: $2.43B vs. FFXXF: $216.58M
FFXDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.43B. FFXXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $216.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFXDF is a better buy in the long-term than FFXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFXXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFXXF is a better buy in the short-term than FFXDF.

Price Growth

FFXDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while FFXXF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXDF($2.43B) has a higher market cap than FFXXF($217M). FFXDF YTD gains are higher at: 16.096 vs. FFXXF (-1.471). FFXXF has less debt than FFXDF: FFXXF (461K) vs FFXDF (499M). FFXDF has higher revenues than FFXXF: FFXDF (143M) vs FFXXF (-18.31M).
FFXDFFFXXFFFXDF / FFXXF
Capitalization2.43B217M1,120%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.096-1.471-1,095%
P/E Ratio37.92N/A-
Revenue143M-18.31M-781%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt499M461K108,243%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXDF vs FFXXF: Fundamental Ratings
FFXDF
FFXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8085
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24100
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5484
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
349
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
444

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFXXF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXDF (86). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXXF (100). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (94). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (84). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (49). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDFFFXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MACPX27.320.03
+0.11%
BlackRock Balanced Institutional
YACKX24.57N/A
N/A
AMG Yacktman I
HOOTX30.16-0.12
-0.40%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps R5
CLPAX14.19-0.10
-0.70%
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity A
LVAQX18.95-0.17
-0.89%
LSV Small Cap Value Investor

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and RESCU have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and RESCU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
-1.65%
RESCU - FFXDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - FFXDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - FFXDF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGLD - FFXDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
CNDCF - FFXDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXXF and FFXDF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXXF and FFXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXXF
1D Price
Change %
FFXXF100%
N/A
FFXDF - FFXXF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
MGLD - FFXXF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
AIMFF - FFXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
FRMO - FFXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
GLAE - FFXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More