FFWM
Price
$6.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
501.73M
51 days until earnings call
SFBS
Price
$87.50
Change
-$0.74 (-0.84%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs SFBS

Header iconFFWM vs SFBS Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs SFBSBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$6.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.04M
Capitalization501.73M
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$87.50
Change-$0.74 (-0.84%)
Volume$232.32K
Capitalization4.78B
FFWM vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. SFBS commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a StrongBuy and SFBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $6.09 vs. SFBS: $87.50)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 124% vs. SFBS: 107%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $501.73M vs. SFBS: $4.78B
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $501.73M. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than SFBS.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.35% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($4.78B) has a higher market cap than FFWM($502M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than SFBS: FFWM (40.53) vs SFBS (19.15). SFBS YTD gains are higher at: 4.541 vs. FFWM (-1.932). SFBS has less debt than FFWM: SFBS (64.7M) vs FFWM (1.84B). SFBS has higher revenues than FFWM: SFBS (516M) vs FFWM (66.3M).
FFWMSFBSFFWM / SFBS
Capitalization502M4.78B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.9324.541-43%
P/E Ratio40.5319.15212%
Revenue66.3M516M13%
Total CashN/A122M-
Total Debt1.84B64.7M2,849%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2766
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
6216
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6864
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBS's Valuation (84) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (90). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (100). This means that SFBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (62). This means that SFBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (47). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (68). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QCSCX23.170.12
+0.52%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
RRGCX7.36N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Secc C
PPYIX9.17N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE International Instl
JMEEX67.64N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity R5
LVPSX96.23-0.50
-0.52%
ProFunds Large Cap Value Svc

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with STEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then STEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
N/A
STEL - FFWM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
UBSI - FFWM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
TCBK - FFWM
72%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
HOPE - FFWM
72%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
SFBS - FFWM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
-0.84%
SBCF - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
UBSI - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
FBK - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
TRMK - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
SSB - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
More