FFWM
Price
$6.25
Change
+$0.09 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:28 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
511.4M
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBBK
Price
$19.81
Change
-$1.34 (-6.34%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
Capitalization
47.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs PBBK

Header iconFFWM vs PBBK Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs PBBKBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$6.25
Change+$0.09 (+1.46%)
Volume$100
Capitalization511.4M
PB Bankshares
Price$19.81
Change-$1.34 (-6.34%)
Volume$31.85K
Capitalization47.04M
FFWM vs PBBK Comparison Chart in %
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. PBBK commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a Hold and PBBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FFWM: $6.17 vs. PBBK: $19.81)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and PBBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 50% vs. PBBK: 233%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $511.4M vs. PBBK: $47.04M
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $511.4M. PBBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePBBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PBBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFWM and PBBK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBBK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than PBBK.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PBBK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFWM($511M) has a higher market cap than PBBK($47M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than PBBK: FFWM (41.60) vs PBBK (20.21). FFWM YTD gains are higher at: 0.162 vs. PBBK (-6.336). PBBK has less debt than FFWM: PBBK (43.6M) vs FFWM (1.6B). FFWM has higher revenues than PBBK: FFWM (196M) vs PBBK (13.4M).
FFWMPBBKFFWM / PBBK
Capitalization511M47M1,087%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.162-6.336-3%
P/E Ratio41.6020.21206%
Revenue196M13.4M1,463%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.6B43.6M3,661%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMPBBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
28%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REFR1.360.03
+2.26%
Research Frontiers
GNZUF0.50N/A
N/A
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
KNCAF2.90N/A
N/A
Konica Minolta Inc.
PBTHF0.38N/A
N/A
PointsBet Holdings Limited
LWAY22.08-0.50
-2.19%
Lifeway Foods

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with STEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then STEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+1.98%
STEL - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
HOPE - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
UBSI - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
BANC - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
FMBH - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
More

PBBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBBK and NWFL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBBK and NWFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBBK
1D Price
Change %
PBBK100%
N/A
NWFL - PBBK
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
ECBK - PBBK
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
MSBI - PBBK
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
FFWM - PBBK
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
HACBY - PBBK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More