FFWM
Price
$6.16
Change
-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
510.57M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBBK
Price
$21.50
Change
+$0.10 (+0.47%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
51.05M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs PBBK

Header iconFFWM vs PBBK Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs PBBKBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$6.16
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Volume$167.08K
Capitalization510.57M
PB Bankshares
Price$21.50
Change+$0.10 (+0.47%)
Volume$3.3K
Capitalization51.05M
FFWM vs PBBK Comparison Chart in %
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. PBBK commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a StrongBuy and PBBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $6.16 vs. PBBK: $21.50)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and PBBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 17% vs. PBBK: 33%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $510.57M vs. PBBK: $51.05M
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $510.57M. PBBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $51.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePBBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PBBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFWM and PBBK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBBK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBBK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than PBBK.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while PBBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFWM($511M) has a higher market cap than PBBK($51.1M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than PBBK: FFWM (41.60) vs PBBK (21.94). PBBK YTD gains are higher at: 40.707 vs. FFWM (-0.805). PBBK has less debt than FFWM: PBBK (43.6M) vs FFWM (1.6B). FFWM has higher revenues than PBBK: FFWM (196M) vs PBBK (13.4M).
FFWMPBBKFFWM / PBBK
Capitalization511M51.1M1,000%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.80540.707-2%
P/E Ratio41.6021.94190%
Revenue196M13.4M1,463%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.6B43.6M3,661%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMPBBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBCRX12.380.06
+0.49%
RBC China Equity R6
PWGIX27.340.10
+0.37%
Impax US Sustainable Economy Instl
VYSDX9.880.03
+0.30%
Voya MI Dynamic Small Cap R
SBMAX32.940.04
+0.12%
ClearBridge Mid Cap A
ODIYX131.870.09
+0.07%
Invesco Discovery Y

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
-0.16%
HOPE - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
UBSI - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
STEL - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
FMBH - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
TCBK - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
More

PBBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBBK has been loosely correlated with NWFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBBK jumps, then NWFL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBBK
1D Price
Change %
PBBK100%
+0.47%
NWFL - PBBK
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
OVLY - PBBK
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
FFWM - PBBK
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
ECBK - PBBK
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
BSBK - PBBK
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More