FFWM
Price
$6.04
Change
-$0.03 (-0.49%)
Updated
Dec 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
503.94M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$49.30
Change
-$0.14 (-0.28%)
Updated
Dec 12, 12:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
803.58M
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs MBWM

Header iconFFWM vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs MBWMBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$6.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.49%)
Volume$4.1K
Capitalization503.94M
Mercantile Bank
Price$49.30
Change-$0.14 (-0.28%)
Volume$200
Capitalization803.58M
FFWM vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. MBWM commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a Buy and MBWM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $6.08 vs. MBWM: $49.44)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 88% vs. MBWM: 126%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $503.94M vs. MBWM: $803.58M
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $503.94M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $803.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than FFWM.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.23% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($804M) has a higher market cap than FFWM($504M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: FFWM (41.60) vs MBWM (9.38). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: 13.876 vs. FFWM (-2.093). MBWM has less debt than FFWM: MBWM (496M) vs FFWM (1.84B). MBWM has higher revenues than FFWM: MBWM (235M) vs FFWM (66.3M).
FFWMMBWMFFWM / MBWM
Capitalization504M804M63%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.09313.876-15%
P/E Ratio41.609.38443%
Revenue66.3M235M28%
Total CashN/A98.9M-
Total Debt1.84B496M372%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
6227
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (91). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFWM (100). This means that MBWM’s stock grew significantly faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (62). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (50). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (62). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MITHX39.330.23
+0.59%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R3
IWIRX67.520.23
+0.34%
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Inv
FSYRX11.72N/A
N/A
Fidelity Sustainable International Eq
EQNAX24.33N/A
N/A
MFS Equity Income A
JIGZX88.68-7.16
-7.47%
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity R2

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+0.98%
PEBO - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
FMBH - MBWM
85%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
HOPE - MBWM
85%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
OSBC - MBWM
85%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
CTBI - MBWM
85%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
More