FFWM
Price
$6.16
Change
-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
510.57M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOPE
Price
$11.28
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.45B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs HOPE

Header iconFFWM vs HOPE Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs HOPEBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$6.16
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Volume$167.08K
Capitalization510.57M
Hope Ban
Price$11.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$366.9K
Capitalization1.45B
FFWM vs HOPE Comparison Chart in %
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOPE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. HOPE commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a StrongBuy and HOPE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $6.16 vs. HOPE: $11.28)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and HOPE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 17% vs. HOPE: 39%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $510.57M vs. HOPE: $1.45B
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $510.57M. HOPE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOPE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HOPE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOPE is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOPE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HOPE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than HOPE.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while HOPE (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

HOPE is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOPE($1.45B) has a higher market cap than FFWM($511M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than HOPE: FFWM (41.60) vs HOPE (28.92). FFWM YTD gains are higher at: -0.805 vs. HOPE (-3.178). HOPE has less debt than FFWM: HOPE (194M) vs FFWM (1.6B). HOPE has higher revenues than FFWM: HOPE (470M) vs FFWM (196M).
FFWMHOPEFFWM / HOPE
Capitalization511M1.45B35%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.805-3.17825%
P/E Ratio41.6028.92144%
Revenue196M470M42%
Total CashN/A253M-
Total Debt1.6B194M823%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs HOPE: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
HOPE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1773
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
8719
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOPE's Valuation (85) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's SMR Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFWM (87) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew significantly faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMHOPE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOPE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BARDX8.160.04
+0.49%
iShares Developed Real Estate Idx Inv A
MGLRX16.190.06
+0.37%
MFS Global Real Estate R6
HEIIX12.520.03
+0.24%
Hennessy Equity and Income Institutional
BEGIX17.52N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl
FFAMX23.05N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
-0.16%
HOPE - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
UBSI - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
STEL - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
FMBH - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
TCBK - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
More

HOPE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOPE has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOPE jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOPE
1D Price
Change %
HOPE100%
+0.09%
UBSI - HOPE
88%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
NBTB - HOPE
87%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
TCBK - HOPE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
PEBO - HOPE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
STEL - HOPE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More