FFWM
Price
$4.98
Change
+$0.13 (+2.68%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
407.13M
10 days until earnings call
HOPE
Price
$9.52
Change
+$0.12 (+1.28%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFWM vs HOPE

Header iconFFWM vs HOPE Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs HOPEBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$4.98
Change+$0.13 (+2.68%)
Volume$1.11M
Capitalization407.13M
Hope Ban
Price$9.52
Change+$0.12 (+1.28%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization1.34B
FFWM vs HOPE Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOPE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. HOPE commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a Hold and HOPE is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $4.98 vs. HOPE: $9.52)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and HOPE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 148% vs. HOPE: 103%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $407.13M vs. HOPE: $1.34B
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $407.13M. HOPE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOPE’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HOPE’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOPE is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOPE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HOPE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than HOPE.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.03% price change this week, while HOPE (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

HOPE is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOPE($1.34B) has a higher market cap than FFWM($407M). HOPE has higher P/E ratio than FFWM: HOPE (10.04) vs FFWM (3.63). FFWM YTD gains are higher at: -19.807 vs. HOPE (-21.612). FFWM has less debt than HOPE: FFWM (1.58B) vs HOPE (1.96B). HOPE has higher revenues than FFWM: HOPE (571M) vs FFWM (175M).
FFWMHOPEFFWM / HOPE
Capitalization407M1.34B30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.807-21.61292%
P/E Ratio3.6310.0436%
Revenue175M571M31%
Total CashN/A173M-
Total Debt1.58B1.96B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs HOPE: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
HOPE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
3714
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6377
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6221
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOPE's Valuation (25) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (86) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's SMR Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (77) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMHOPE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOPE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been loosely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+2.68%
HOPE - FFWM
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
CUBI - FFWM
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
SFBS - FFWM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
MBWM - FFWM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
CTBI - FFWM
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

HOPE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOPE has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOPE jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOPE
1D Price
Change %
HOPE100%
+1.28%
UBSI - HOPE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
NWBI - HOPE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
FFBC - HOPE
89%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
EBC - HOPE
88%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
FFIN - HOPE
88%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
More