FFWM
Price
$5.66
Change
+$0.12 (+2.17%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
459.18M
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMBH
Price
$40.28
Change
-$0.07 (-0.17%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
968.55M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs FMBH

Header iconFFWM vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs FMBHBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$5.66
Change+$0.12 (+2.17%)
Volume$15.94K
Capitalization459.18M
First Mid Bancshares
Price$40.28
Change-$0.07 (-0.17%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization968.55M
FFWM vs FMBH Comparison Chart in %
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. FMBH commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a StrongBuy and FMBH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $5.54 vs. FMBH: $40.35)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 61% vs. FMBH: 127%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $459.18M vs. FMBH: $968.55M
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $459.18M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $968.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.78% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($969M) has a higher market cap than FFWM($459M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: FFWM (41.60) vs FMBH (11.05). FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 11.713 vs. FFWM (-10.789). FMBH has less debt than FFWM: FMBH (363M) vs FFWM (1.84B). FMBH has higher revenues than FFWM: FMBH (331M) vs FFWM (66.3M).
FFWMFMBHFFWM / FMBH
Capitalization459M969M47%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.78911.713-92%
P/E Ratio41.6011.05376%
Revenue66.3M331M20%
Total CashN/A16.1M-
Total Debt1.84B363M508%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5827
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10053
SMR RATING
1..100
6225
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5861
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFWM's Valuation (90) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (98). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (100). This means that FMBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (62). This means that FMBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (61). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (61). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCTGX31.260.47
+1.53%
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth M
MXYKX5.350.05
+0.94%
Empower T. Rowe Price Mid Cp Gr Instl
RYBCX67.430.55
+0.82%
Rydex Basic Materials C
LGOVX36.880.23
+0.63%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R6
WBALX17.280.08
+0.47%
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Inv Cl

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+2.97%
HOPE - FFWM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
STEL - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
UBSI - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
TRMK - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
FMBH - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
+4.13%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
+4.13%
TCBK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
BUSE - FMBH
88%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
CTBI - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
UBSI - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
TRMK - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
More