FFWC
Price
$40.00
Change
+$1.11 (+2.85%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
12.29M
FINN
Price
$13000.00
Change
+$100.00 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWC vs FINN

Header iconFFWC vs FINN Comparison
Open Charts FFWC vs FINNBanner chart's image
FFW
Price$40.00
Change+$1.11 (+2.85%)
Volume$301
Capitalization12.29M
First National of Nebraska
Price$13000.00
Change+$100.00 (+0.78%)
Volume$1
Capitalization1.52B
FFWC vs FINN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWC vs. FINN commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWC is a StrongBuy and FINN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWC: $40.00 vs. FINN: $13000.00)
Brand notoriety: FFWC and FINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWC: 61% vs. FINN: 14%
Market capitalization -- FFWC: $12.29M vs. FINN: $1.52B
FFWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.29M. FINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFINN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FINN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the long-term than FINN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FINN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FINN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the short-term than FINN.

Price Growth

FFWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.85% price change this week, while FINN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FINN($1.52B) has a higher market cap than FFWC($12.3M). FINN YTD gains are higher at: 7.251 vs. FFWC (1.523). FFWC has less debt than FINN: FFWC (58.7M) vs FINN (534M). FINN has higher revenues than FFWC: FINN (338M) vs FFWC (10.2M).
FFWCFINNFFWC / FINN
Capitalization12.3M1.52B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.5237.25121%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue10.2M338M3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt58.7M534M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWC vs FINN: Fundamental Ratings
FFWC
FINN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5227
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1569
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFWC's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FINN (48). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FINN’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (52). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (6). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (53). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FINN (69). This means that FFWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FINN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWCFINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
24%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVLZX36.650.28
+0.77%
Fidelity Advisor Value Z
TWCCX64.990.27
+0.42%
American Century Ultra® C
MRRFX17.430.03
+0.17%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value R
JHTCX19.810.01
+0.05%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 C
HMSIX12.57-0.08
-0.63%
Hennessy Midstream Institutional

FFWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFWC and FFDF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFWC and FFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWC
1D Price
Change %
FFWC100%
+2.85%
FFDF - FFWC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFWC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFWC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FINN - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FINN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FINN and HACBY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FINN and HACBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FINN
1D Price
Change %
FINN100%
N/A
HACBY - FINN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLST - FINN
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
FFMR - FINN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FINN
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - FINN
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More