FFWC
Price
$39.96
Change
+$0.26 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
12.29M
FIBH
Price
$29.00
Change
+$0.97 (+3.46%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
16.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWC vs FIBH

Header iconFFWC vs FIBH Comparison
Open Charts FFWC vs FIBHBanner chart's image
FFW
Price$39.96
Change+$0.26 (+0.65%)
Volume$110
Capitalization12.29M
First Bancshares
Price$29.00
Change+$0.97 (+3.46%)
Volume$200
Capitalization16.67M
FFWC vs FIBH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWC vs. FIBH commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWC is a Buy and FIBH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWC: $39.96 vs. FIBH: $28.67)
Brand notoriety: FFWC and FIBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWC: 35% vs. FIBH: 45%
Market capitalization -- FFWC: $12.29M vs. FIBH: $16.67M
FFWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.29M. FIBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFIBH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FIBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the long-term than FIBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIBH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FIBH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FIBH is a better buy in the short-term than FFWC.

Price Growth

FFWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FIBH (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIBH($16.7M) has a higher market cap than FFWC($12.3M). FIBH YTD gains are higher at: 14.408 vs. FFWC (1.421).
FFWCFIBHFFWC / FIBH
Capitalization12.3M16.7M74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.42114.40810%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue10.2MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt58.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWC vs FIBH: Fundamental Ratings
FFWC
FIBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1455
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIBH's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (34). This means that FIBH’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIBH (100). This means that FFWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FIBH (6). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FIBH (63). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIBH (55). This means that FFWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWCFIBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAVMY28.430.54
+1.94%
Abn Amro BK N V
PIHG1.50N/A
N/A
Plural Industry Holding Group Co. Limited
JTEKY24.00N/A
N/A
JTEKT Corp.
CNDAU12.49N/A
N/A
Concord Acquisition Corp II
CITZ31.25-0.25
-0.79%
Citizens Bancshares Corp South Carolina

FFWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFWC and FFDF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFWC and FFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWC
1D Price
Change %
FFWC100%
N/A
FFDF - FFWC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFWC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFWC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
FINN - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

FIBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIBH and FOTB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIBH and FOTB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIBH
1D Price
Change %
FIBH100%
N/A
FOTB - FIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITUB - FIBH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
FFWC - FIBH
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFDF - FIBH
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - FIBH
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More