FFWC
Price
$40.00
Change
+$0.50 (+1.27%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
43.45M
FIBH
Price
$31.00
Change
+$0.20 (+0.65%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
16.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWC vs FIBH

Header iconFFWC vs FIBH Comparison
Open Charts FFWC vs FIBHBanner chart's image
FFW
Price$40.00
Change+$0.50 (+1.27%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization43.45M
First Bancshares
Price$31.00
Change+$0.20 (+0.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization16.87M
FFWC vs FIBH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWC vs. FIBH commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWC is a StrongBuy and FIBH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWC: $40.00 vs. FIBH: $31.00)
Brand notoriety: FFWC and FIBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWC: 117% vs. FIBH: 39%
Market capitalization -- FFWC: $43.45M vs. FIBH: $16.87M
FFWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $43.45M. FIBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFIBH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FIBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FIBH is a better buy in the long-term than FFWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIBH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FIBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the short-term than FIBH.

Price Growth

FFWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while FIBH (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFWC($43.5M) has a higher market cap than FIBH($16.9M). FIBH YTD gains are higher at: 23.706 vs. FFWC (1.523).
FFWCFIBHFFWC / FIBH
Capitalization43.5M16.9M257%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.52323.7066%
P/E Ratio11.02N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt58.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWC vs FIBH: Fundamental Ratings
FFWC
FIBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3392
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5688
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1248
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIBH's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (39). This means that FIBH’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FIBH (88). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as FIBH (5). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

FIBH's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (52). This means that FIBH’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIBH (48). This means that FFWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWCFIBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPRUY24.820.05
+0.20%
Kering SA
CCCMF28.20N/A
N/A
Cancom AG
GLNS0.75N/A
N/A
Golden Star Resource Corp
PHTCF20.52N/A
N/A
PLDT Inc.
NLIBF0.28N/A
N/A
NOA LITHIUM BRINES INC

FFWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFWC and FFDF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFWC and FFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWC
1D Price
Change %
FFWC100%
N/A
FFDF - FFWC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFWC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFWC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
FINN - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More

FIBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIBH and FOTB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIBH and FOTB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIBH
1D Price
Change %
FIBH100%
N/A
FOTB - FIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITUB - FIBH
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFWC - FIBH
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFDF - FIBH
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - FIBH
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More