Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFVFX vs RRTMX
FFVFX vs RRTMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFVFX vs. RRTMX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFVFX is a Hold and RRTMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRTMX has more cash in the bank: 5.17B vs. FFVFX (4.32B). FFVFX pays higher dividends than RRTMX: FFVFX (2.72) vs RRTMX (2.25). FFVFX was incepted earlier than RRTMX: FFVFX (22 years) vs RRTMX (18 years). RRTMX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FFVFX (0.52). RRTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.80 vs. FFVFX (13.00). FFVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRTMX: FFVFX (0) vs RRTMX (2500). RRTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. FFVFX (4.79). FFVFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.61 vs. RRTMX (-1.37).
| FFVFX | RRTMX | FFVFX / RRTMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.00 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.00 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.435 | 3.728 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.32B | 5.17B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 2.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 5.38 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.80 | 11.71 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.61 | -1.37 | -481% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.14 | 0.66 | 1,239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement