Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFVCX vs TRRGX
FFVCX vs TRRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFVCX vs. TRRGX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFVCX is a Hold and TRRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRRGX has more cash in the bank: 5.25B vs. FFVCX (436M). TRRGX pays higher dividends than FFVCX: TRRGX (2.60) vs FFVCX (1.66). FFVCX was incepted earlier than TRRGX: FFVCX (22 years) vs TRRGX (21 years). FFVCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than TRRGX (0.50). TRRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.80 vs. FFVCX (13.00). FFVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRRGX: FFVCX (0) vs TRRGX (2500). TRRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. FFVCX (3.89). TRRGX return over 5 years is better than : 2.19 vs. FFVCX (0.21).
| FFVCX | TRRGX | FFVCX / TRRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.50 | 304% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.50 | 304% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.261 | 6.280 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 5.25B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.60 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.89 | 6.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.03 | 14.51 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.21 | 2.19 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.73 | 9.18 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers