Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFVCX vs TRRGX
FFVCX vs TRRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFVCX vs. TRRGX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFVCX is a Hold and TRRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRRGX has more cash in the bank: 5.17B vs. FFVCX (430M). TRRGX pays higher dividends than FFVCX: TRRGX (2.66) vs FFVCX (1.70). FFVCX was incepted earlier than TRRGX: FFVCX (22 years) vs TRRGX (21 years). FFVCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than TRRGX (0.50). TRRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.80 vs. FFVCX (13.00). FFVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRRGX: FFVCX (0) vs TRRGX (2500). TRRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.25 vs. FFVCX (2.84). TRRGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.29 vs. FFVCX (0.17).
| FFVCX | TRRGX | FFVCX / TRRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.50 | 304% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.50 | 304% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.323 | 3.975 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 430M | 5.17B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 2.66 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.84 | 6.25 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.81 | 13.64 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.17 | 1.29 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.05 | 6.03 | -150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement