Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFVCX vs RRTMX
FFVCX vs RRTMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFVCX vs. RRTMX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFVCX is a Hold and RRTMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRTMX has more cash in the bank: 5.25B vs. FFVCX (436M). RRTMX pays higher dividends than FFVCX: RRTMX (2.20) vs FFVCX (1.66). FFVCX was incepted earlier than RRTMX: FFVCX (22 years) vs RRTMX (18 years). FFVCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RRTMX (1.00). RRTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.80 vs. FFVCX (13.00). FFVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRTMX: FFVCX (0) vs RRTMX (2500). RRTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. FFVCX (3.89). FFVCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.21 vs. RRTMX (-0.76).
| FFVCX | RRTMX | FFVCX / RRTMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.00 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.00 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.261 | 5.997 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 5.25B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.20 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.89 | 6.31 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.03 | 12.59 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.21 | -0.76 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.73 | 3.63 | -185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers