Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTYX vs RGACX
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFTYX vs RGACX
AB Sustainable US Thematic Advisor
Price$4.19
Change+$0.03 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.1M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTYX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTYX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FFTYX (14.1M). FFTYX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFTYX (1.34) vs RGACX (0.07). FFTYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFTYX (8 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) and FFTYX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . FFTYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FFTYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFTYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. FFTYX (-79.67). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 29.83 vs. FFTYX (-76.90).
| FFTYX | RGACX | FFTYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -73.731 | 18.558 | -397% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.1M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.07 | 1,961% |
| Returns for 1 year | -79.67 | 6.46 | -1,233% |
| Returns for 3 years | -75.83 | 60.09 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -76.90 | 29.83 | -258% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement