Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTYX vs RGACX
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFTYX vs RGACX
AB Sustainable US Thematic Advisor
Price$4.19
Change+$0.01 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.5M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTYX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTYX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FFTYX (12.5M). FFTYX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFTYX (1.34) vs RGACX (0.07). FFTYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFTYX (9 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FFTYX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). FFTYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FFTYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFTYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. FFTYX (-73.89). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. FFTYX (-77.54).
| FFTYX | RGACX | FFTYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.93 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -73.414 | 8.821 | -832% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.07 | 1,961% |
| Returns for 1 year | -73.89 | 5.45 | -1,355% |
| Returns for 3 years | -71.95 | 63.36 | -114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -77.54 | 20.43 | -380% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement