Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTYX vs RGACX
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFTYX vs RGACX
AB Sustainable US Thematic Advisor
Price$17.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.72M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTYX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTYX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FFTYX (31.7M). FFTYX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFTYX (1.06) vs RGACX (0.07). FFTYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFTYX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and FFTYX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . FFTYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FFTYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFTYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. FFTYX (-17.09). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. FFTYX (-1.58).
| FFTYX | RGACX | FFTYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.868 | 17.655 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.7M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.07 | 1,525% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.09 | 11.01 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.25 | 70.57 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.58 | 37.85 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement