Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTYX vs RGACX
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFTYX vs RGACX
AB Sustainable US Thematic Advisor
Price$4.17
Change-$0.01 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.65
Change-$0.84 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTYX vs. RGACX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTYX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FFTYX (10M). FFTYX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFTYX (0.36) vs RGACX (0.00). FFTYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFTYX (9 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FFTYX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). FFTYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FFTYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFTYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. FFTYX (-73.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. FFTYX (-77.90).
| FFTYX | RGACX | FFTYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.93 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.969 | 1.549 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -73.51 | 8.96 | -820% |
| Returns for 3 years | -73.36 | 54.48 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -77.90 | 18.14 | -430% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement