Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTYX vs RGACX
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFTYX vs RGACX
AB Sustainable US Thematic Advisor
Price$4.17
Change-$0.09 (-2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTYX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTYX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FFTYX (25.9M). FFTYX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFTYX (1.04) vs RGACX (0.07). FFTYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFTYX (8 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) and FFTYX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . FFTYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FFTYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFTYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. FFTYX (-78.94). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. FFTYX (-75.72).
| FFTYX | RGACX | FFTYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -72.970 | 19.364 | -377% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.07 | 1,536% |
| Returns for 1 year | -78.94 | 8.31 | -950% |
| Returns for 3 years | -74.59 | 63.31 | -118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -75.72 | 37.90 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement