Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTY vs IMCG
FFTY vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FFTY vs IMCG
Innovator IBD® 50 ETF
Price$30.10
Change-$0.52 (-1.70%)
Volume$35.38K
Net Assets75.32M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$77.15
Change-$1.09 (-1.39%)
Volume$60.41K
Net Assets2.68B
FFTY vs IMCG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTY vs. IMCG commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTY is a Hold and IMCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.68B vs. FFTY (75.3M). FFTY has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: FFTY (5.282) vs IMCG (2.315). FFTY was incepted earlier than IMCG: FFTY (10 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FFTY (0.80). FFTY has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| FFTY | IMCG | FFTY / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 5.282 | 2.315 | 228% |
| Net Assets | 75.3M | 2.68B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.06 | 1,333% |
| Turnover | 1304.00 | 43.00 | 3,033% |
| Yield | 1.02 | 0.75 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFTY | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 28 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 26 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFTY has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFTY jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFTY | 100% | -1.70% | ||
| VRT - FFTY | 74% Closely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| ANET - FFTY | 69% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| OWL - FFTY | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| SNPS - FFTY | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| ARES - FFTY | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.49% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||