Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTY vs IMCG
FFTY vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FFTY vs IMCG
Innovator IBD® 50 ETF
Price$32.65
Change+$0.71 (+2.22%)
Volume$37.58K
Net Assets81.69M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$81.29
Change+$0.83 (+1.03%)
Volume$51.64K
Net Assets2.84B
FFTY vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTY vs. IMCG commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTY is a Hold and IMCG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.84B vs. FFTY (81.7M). FFTY has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: FFTY (14.201) vs IMCG (7.995). FFTY was incepted earlier than IMCG: FFTY (10 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FFTY (0.80). FFTY has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| FFTY | IMCG | FFTY / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 14.201 | 7.995 | 178% |
| Net Assets | 81.7M | 2.84B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.06 | 1,333% |
| Turnover | 1304.00 | 43.00 | 3,033% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFTY | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFTY has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFTY jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFTY | 100% | +2.22% | ||
| VRT - FFTY | 73% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| ANET - FFTY | 69% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| SNPS - FFTY | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| OWL - FFTY | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| CDNS - FFTY | 64% Loosely correlated | +5.10% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||