Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBFX
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$22.66
Change-$0.22 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.08B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.11
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FFTMX (10.1B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFTMX: RLBFX (1.97) vs FFTMX (1.73). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FFTMX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). FFTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.86 vs. RLBFX (9.09). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. FFTMX (22.99).
| FFTMX | RLBFX | FFTMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.893 | 15.095 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.97 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.86 | 9.09 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.29 | 43.82 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.99 | 41.33 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.41 | 77.46 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement