Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBEX
FFTMX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBEX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$22.69
Change+$0.15 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$39.20
Change+$0.26 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
FFTMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. FFTMX (9.97B). RLBEX (1.74) and FFTMX (1.74) have matching dividends . FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). FFTMX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). FFTMX (8.85) and RLBEX (8.70) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.04 vs. FFTMX (23.75).
| FFTMX | RLBEX | FFTMX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.59 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.59 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.200 | 14.631 | 83% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.97B | 266B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.74 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.85 | 8.70 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.61 | 50.52 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.75 | 42.04 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.89 | 77.69 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement