Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$22.66
Change-$0.22 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.08B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FFTMX (10.1B). FFTMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFTMX (1.73) vs RLBAX (1.08). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFTMX (1.08). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.86 vs. RLBAX (7.89). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. FFTMX (22.99).
| FFTMX | RLBAX | FFTMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.893 | 14.065 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.08 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.86 | 7.89 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.29 | 39.62 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.99 | 35.24 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.41 | 66.41 | 77% |