Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$22.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.76B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FFTMX (9.76B). FFTMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFTMX (1.78) vs RLBAX (1.15). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFTMX (1.08). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (7.27) and FFTMX (7.17) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. FFTMX (26.19).
| FFTMX | RLBAX | FFTMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.090 | 12.531 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.76B | 263B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.15 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.17 | 7.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.92 | 48.19 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.19 | 40.00 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.69 | 74.51 | 72% |