Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$22.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.34B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FFTMX (10.3B). FFTMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFTMX (1.86) vs RLBAX (1.25). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFTMX (1.10). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. FFTMX (11.37). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.37 vs. FFTMX (14.79).
| FFTMX | RLBAX | FFTMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.752 | 2.290 | 76% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 270B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.25 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.37 | 13.33 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.17 | 34.62 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | 32.37 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.13 | 80.23 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers