Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSM vs SCHM
FFSM vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FFSM vs SCHM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Price$30.72
Change+$0.38 (+1.25%)
Volume$94.35K
Net Assets884.38M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$30.07
Change+$0.26 (+0.87%)
Volume$4.83K
Net Assets12.13B
FFSM vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSM vs. SCHM commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSM is a Hold and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. FFSM (884M). FFSM has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: FFSM (13.478) vs SCHM (8.756). FFSM was incepted earlier than SCHM: FFSM (5 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FFSM (0.43). FFSM has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FFSM | SCHM | FFSM / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 13.478 | 8.756 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 884M | 12.1B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.04 | 1,075% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 13.00 | 508% |
| Yield | 0.63 | 1.41 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFSM | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 79% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFSM has been closely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFSM jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFSM | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| BDC - FFSM | 86% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| SF - FFSM | 84% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| LAZ - FFSM | 82% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| AIT - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| WTFC - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.12% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||