Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSM vs SCHM
FFSM vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FFSM vs SCHM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Price$31.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$62.18K
Net Assets969.57M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$30.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
Volume$973
Net Assets12.55B
FFSM vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSM vs. SCHM commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSM is a StrongBuy and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.5B vs. FFSM (970M). FFSM has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: FFSM (17.654) vs SCHM (11.911). FFSM was incepted earlier than SCHM: FFSM (5 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FFSM (0.43). FFSM has a higher turnover SCHM (17.00) vs SCHM (17.00).
| FFSM | SCHM | FFSM / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.654 | 11.911 | 148% |
| Net Assets | 970M | 12.5B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.04 | 1,075% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 17.00 | 388% |
| Yield | 0.63 | 1.41 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFSM | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFSM has been closely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFSM jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFSM | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| BDC - FFSM | 86% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SF - FFSM | 84% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| LAZ - FFSM | 82% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AIT - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| WTFC - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||