GTES | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFSM | GTES | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 5 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago80% | 7 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFSM has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFSM jumps, then SF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FFSM | 100% | +0.68% | ||
SF - FFSM | 85% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
LAZ - FFSM | 82% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
GTES - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
BDC - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
EWBC - FFSM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTES has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTES jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GTES | 100% | +1.40% | ||
PH - GTES | 77% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
DOV - GTES | 77% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
EMR - GTES | 76% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
ITT - GTES | 75% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
FLS - GTES | 73% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More |