Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSFX vs RHLTX
FFSFX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. FFSFX (2.22B). FFSFX (0.93) and RHLTX (0.91) have matching dividends . FFSFX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFSFX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). FFSFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RHLTX (0.53). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFSFX (0) vs RHLTX (250). RHLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.61 vs. FFSFX (10.49). RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 62.40 vs. FFSFX (48.71).
| FFSFX | RHLTX | FFSFX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.53 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.53 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.283 | 11.347 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 5.12B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.91 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 13.61 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.29 | 49.31 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.71 | 62.40 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement