Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSFX vs RHLTX
FFSFX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. FFSFX (2.22B). FFSFX (0.92) and RHLTX (0.90) have matching dividends . FFSFX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFSFX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). FFSFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RHLTX (0.53). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFSFX (0) vs RHLTX (250). RHLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. FFSFX (13.11). RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 58.48 vs. FFSFX (47.39).
| FFSFX | RHLTX | FFSFX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.53 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.53 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.189 | 10.143 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 5.12B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.90 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 13.90 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.94 | 42.38 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.39 | 58.48 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement