Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSFX vs RFVTX
FFSFX vs RFVTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFVTX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. FFSFX (2.22B). RFVTX pays higher dividends than FFSFX: RFVTX (1.01) vs FFSFX (0.93). FFSFX was incepted earlier than RFVTX: FFSFX (6 years) vs RFVTX (5 years). FFSFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RFVTX (0.39). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RFVTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFVTX: FFSFX (0) vs RFVTX (250). RFVTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.82 vs. FFSFX (10.49). RFVTX return over 5 years is better than : 63.73 vs. FFSFX (48.71).
| FFSFX | RFVTX | FFSFX / RFVTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.39 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.39 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.283 | 11.492 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 5.12B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.01 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 13.82 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.29 | 49.99 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.71 | 63.73 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement