Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSFX vs REOTX
FFSFX vs REOTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REOTX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. FFSFX (2.22B). REOTX (0.97) and FFSFX (0.93) have matching dividends . FFSFX was incepted earlier than REOTX: FFSFX (6 years) vs REOTX (5 years). FFSFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than REOTX (0.44). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. REOTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than REOTX: FFSFX (0) vs REOTX (250). REOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. FFSFX (10.49). REOTX return over 5 years is better than : 63.30 vs. FFSFX (48.71).
| FFSFX | REOTX | FFSFX / REOTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.44 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.44 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.283 | 11.442 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 5.12B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.97 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 13.79 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.29 | 49.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.71 | 63.30 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LSSIX | 28.99 | 0.55 | +1.93% |
| Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Instl | |||
| NMUCX | 10.18 | 0.06 | +0.59% |
| Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C | |||
| JDESX | 46.23 | 0.26 | +0.57% |
| JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity I | |||
| SUTCX | 16.13 | 0.07 | +0.44% |
| AB Sustainable US Thematic C | |||
| HWVZX | 12.25 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val Z | |||