Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSFX vs RDLTX
FFSFX vs RDLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDLTX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. FFSFX (2.22B). FFSFX pays higher dividends than RDLTX: FFSFX (0.92) vs RDLTX (0.75). FFSFX was incepted earlier than RDLTX: FFSFX (6 years) vs RDLTX (5 years). RDLTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFSFX (0.68). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RDLTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLTX: FFSFX (0) vs RDLTX (250). RDLTX (13.64) and FFSFX (13.11) have marching annual gain over last year. RDLTX return over 5 years is better than : 56.79 vs. FFSFX (47.39).
| FFSFX | RDLTX | FFSFX / RDLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.74 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.74 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.189 | 10.000 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 5.12B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 13.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.94 | 41.51 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.39 | 56.79 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement