Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSFX vs RDLTX
FFSFX vs RDLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDLTX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. FFSFX (2.22B). FFSFX pays higher dividends than RDLTX: FFSFX (0.93) vs RDLTX (0.75). FFSFX was incepted earlier than RDLTX: FFSFX (6 years) vs RDLTX (5 years). FFSFX (0.75) and RDLTX (0.74) have similar cost to investors . FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RDLTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLTX: FFSFX (0) vs RDLTX (250). RDLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.41 vs. FFSFX (10.49). RDLTX return over 5 years is better than : 60.80 vs. FFSFX (48.71).
| FFSFX | RDLTX | FFSFX / RDLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.74 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.74 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.283 | 11.207 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 5.12B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 13.41 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.29 | 48.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.71 | 60.80 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LSSNX | 29.58 | 0.56 | +1.93% |
| Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth N | |||
| NMULX | 11.04 | 0.07 | +0.64% |
| Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp I | |||
| JDEUX | 46.15 | 0.26 | +0.57% |
| JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity R6 | |||
| FFTYX | 16.40 | 0.08 | +0.49% |
| AB Sustainable US Thematic Advisor | |||
| HWVAX | 12.13 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val A | |||