FFPP vs TRAK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFPP is a Hold and TRAK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FFPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRAK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TRAK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TRAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FFPP (@Packaged Software) experienced а +200.30% price change this week, while TRAK (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
TRAK is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FFPP | TRAK | FFPP / TRAK | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 296M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | 7.6M | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.077 | 146.004 | -16% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 56.07 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 19.8M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 23.3M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 593K | - |
FFPP | TRAK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFPP's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAK (69) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAK’s over the last 12 months.
TRAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew significantly faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
TRAK's SMR Rating (65) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
TRAK's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FFPP (60) in the null industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew similarly to FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
TRAK's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew significantly faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
| TRAK | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
FFPP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFPP has been loosely correlated with PYFRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFPP jumps, then PYFRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFPP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFPP | 100% | N/A | ||
| PYFRF - FFPP | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.64% | ||
| MRIN - FFPP | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRAK - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| KGDEY - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TDCSF - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TRAK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TRAK and MSFT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRAK and MSFT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRAK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRAK | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| MSFT - TRAK | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| PLUS - TRAK | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| PYFRF - TRAK | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.64% | ||
| MLNK - TRAK | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| SSNC - TRAK | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||