Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFPNX vs LSCGX
FFPNX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FFPNX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529-F-2
Price$74.05
Change-$1.24 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.10
Change-$0.51 (-2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.25M
FFPNX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFPNX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. LSCGX (130M). FFPNX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: FFPNX (0.65) vs LSCGX (0.00). FFPNX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: FFPNX (5 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FFPNX (0.51). FFPNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). FFPNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: FFPNX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. FFPNX (14.93). FFPNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.85 vs. LSCGX (25.96).
| FFPNX | LSCGX | FFPNX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.95 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.13 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.455 | 17.760 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 130M | 126,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.93 | 16.25 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.20 | 74.19 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.85 | 25.96 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement