FFOXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
GALKF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

FFOXF vs GALKF

Header iconFFOXF vs GALKF Comparison
Open Charts FFOXF vs GALKFBanner chart's image
Firefox Gold
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$75K
CapitalizationN/A
Galantas Gold
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$857.45K
CapitalizationN/A
FFOXF vs GALKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFOXF vs. GALKF commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOXF is a Hold and GALKF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (FFOXF: $0.03 vs. GALKF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FFOXF and GALKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFOXF: 102% vs. GALKF: 1211%
Market capitalization -- FFOXF: $8.36M vs. GALKF: $30.31M
FFOXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.36M. GALKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $30.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFOXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGALKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFOXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GALKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFOXF is a better buy in the long-term than GALKF.

Price Growth

FFOXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.63% price change this week, while GALKF (@Precious Metals) price change was -48.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.55% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GALKF($30.3M) has a higher market cap than FFOXF($8.36M). FFOXF YTD gains are higher at: -61.635 vs. GALKF (-77.778). FFOXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.02M vs. GALKF (-14.31M). GALKF has more cash in the bank: 2.52M vs. FFOXF (942K). FFOXF (0) and GALKF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FFOXFGALKFFFOXF / GALKF
Capitalization8.36M30.3M28%
EBITDA-3.02M-14.31M21%
Gain YTD-61.635-77.77879%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash942K2.52M37%
Total DebtN/A5.82M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GALKF: Fundamental Ratings
GALKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
31

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FFOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFOXF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFOXF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFOXF
1D Price
Change %
FFOXF100%
N/A
CALRF - FFOXF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - FFOXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSLVF - FFOXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AYASF - FFOXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-21.50%
NSUPF - FFOXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
More

GALKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GALKF and ORFDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GALKF and ORFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GALKF
1D Price
Change %
GALKF100%
-36.96%
ORFDF - GALKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
NSUPF - GALKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
ORAAF - GALKF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFOXF - GALKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAGF - GALKF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
More