Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFOG vs IWF
FFOG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FFOG vs IWF
Franklin Focused Growth ETF
Price$41.66
Change-$0.60 (-1.42%)
Volume$13.21K
Net Assets137.2M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$405.57
Change-$5.20 (-1.27%)
Volume$952.15K
Net Assets107.94B
FFOG vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFOG vs. IWF commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOG is a Hold and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 108B vs. FFOG (137M). FFOG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: FFOG (4.256) vs IWF (1.102). FFOG was incepted earlier than IWF: FFOG (9 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FFOG (0.55). IWF has a higher turnover FFOG (9.87) vs FFOG (9.87).
| FFOG | IWF | FFOG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 4.256 | 1.102 | 386% |
| Net Assets | 137M | 108B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.19 | 289% |
| Turnover | 9.87 | 12.00 | 82% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFOG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 71% | 25 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFOG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFOG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFOG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFOG | 100% | -1.42% | ||
| NVDA - FFOG | 84% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| AMZN - FFOG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| META - FFOG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| MSFT - FFOG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| TSM - FFOG | 77% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
More | ||||