Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFND vs SCHG
FFND vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FFND vs SCHG
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$28.23
Change+$0.34 (+1.22%)
Volume$2.7K
Net Assets41.95B
FFND vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFND vs. SCHG commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFND is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 42B vs. FFND (72.4M). FFND has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: FFND (4.826) vs SCHG (0.175). FFND was incepted earlier than SCHG: FFND (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FFND (1.00). FFND has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| FFND | SCHG | FFND / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 4.826 | 0.175 | 2,762% |
| Net Assets | 72.4M | 42B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.04 | 2,500% |
| Turnover | 78.00 | 3.00 | 2,600% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFND | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFND has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFND jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFND | 100% | -1.70% | ||
| AMZN - FFND | 75% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| AXP - FFND | 75% Closely correlated | -3.42% | ||
| GS - FFND | 74% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| BLK - FFND | 71% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| C - FFND | 70% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| COHR - SCHG | 74% Closely correlated | -4.42% | ||
More | ||||