FFMR
Price
$66.25
Change
+$0.25 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
440.55M
FFWC
Price
$39.96
Change
+$0.26 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
12.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMR vs FFWC

Header iconFFMR vs FFWC Comparison
Open Charts FFMR vs FFWCBanner chart's image
First Farmers Financial
Price$66.25
Change+$0.25 (+0.38%)
Volume$350
Capitalization440.55M
FFW
Price$39.96
Change+$0.26 (+0.65%)
Volume$110
Capitalization12.29M
FFMR vs FFWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMR vs. FFWC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMR is a Hold and FFWC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMR: $66.25 vs. FFWC: $39.96)
Brand notoriety: FFMR and FFWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMR: 36% vs. FFWC: 35%
Market capitalization -- FFMR: $440.55M vs. FFWC: $12.29M
FFMR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $440.55M. FFWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFFWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FFWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the long-term than FFMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the short-term than FFMR.

Price Growth

FFMR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while FFWC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMR($441M) has a higher market cap than FFWC($12.3M). FFWC YTD gains are higher at: 1.421 vs. FFMR (0.453). FFWC (58.7M) and FFMR (61.3M) have identical debt. FFMR has higher revenues than FFWC: FFMR (111M) vs FFWC (10.2M).
FFMRFFWCFFMR / FFWC
Capitalization441M12.3M3,585%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.4531.42132%
P/E Ratio10.41N/A-
Revenue111M10.2M1,088%
Total Cash86.7MN/A-
Total Debt61.3M58.7M104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMR vs FFWC: Fundamental Ratings
FFMR
FFWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1851
SMR RATING
1..100
286
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFWC's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMR (86). This means that FFWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWC (51). This means that FFMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (28). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (59). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (30). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMRFFWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGKMX127.320.93
+0.74%
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesZ
LMARX60.830.43
+0.71%
ClearBridge Small Cap R
BWLIX24.410.17
+0.70%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value Inv
FTGQX29.070.13
+0.45%
Templeton Growth C
VIOAX9.820.01
+0.10%
VELA Income Opportunities A

FFMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMR and BKUT have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMR and BKUT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMR
1D Price
Change %
FFMR100%
N/A
BKUT - FFMR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVFL - FFMR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
OPHC - FFMR
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
PEBK - FFMR
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.84%
SOMC - FFMR
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFWC and FFDF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFWC and FFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWC
1D Price
Change %
FFWC100%
N/A
FFDF - FFWC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFWC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFWC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
FINN - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More