FFMH
Price
$45.10
Change
-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
180.28M
PONT
Price
$552.00
Change
+$22.00 (+4.15%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
114.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMH vs PONT

Header iconFFMH vs PONT Comparison
Open Charts FFMH vs PONTBanner chart's image
First Farmers & Merchants
Price$45.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Volume$300
Capitalization180.28M
Pontiac Ban
Price$552.00
Change+$22.00 (+4.15%)
Volume$136
Capitalization114.22M
FFMH vs PONT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMH vs. PONT commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMH is a Hold and PONT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMH: $45.10 vs. PONT: $552.00)
Brand notoriety: FFMH and PONT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMH: 19% vs. PONT: 100%
Market capitalization -- FFMH: $180.28M vs. PONT: $114.22M
FFMH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $180.28M. PONT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $114.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePONT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PONT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMH is a better buy in the long-term than PONT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PONT’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PONT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PONT is a better buy in the short-term than FFMH.

Price Growth

FFMH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while PONT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMH($180M) has a higher market cap than PONT($114M). FFMH (10.23) and PONT (9.81) have similar P/E ratio . FFMH YTD gains are higher at: 30.692 vs. PONT (5.200).
FFMHPONTFFMH / PONT
Capitalization180M114M158%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.6925.200590%
P/E Ratio10.239.81104%
Revenue62.9MN/A-
Total Cash25.6MN/A-
Total Debt10MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMH vs PONT: Fundamental Ratings
FFMH
PONT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
49100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4567
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5033

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PONT's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMH (67). This means that PONT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PONT (100). This means that FFMH’s stock grew significantly faster than PONT’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PONT (100). This means that FFMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PONT’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PONT (53). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to PONT’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as PONT (67). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to PONT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMHPONT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNVMX19.040.24
+1.28%
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR6
SLPAX15.110.15
+1.00%
SEI Small Cap A (SIIT)
SLVCX18.240.13
+0.72%
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
MRGAX55.800.34
+0.61%
MFS Core Equity A
PDEZX19.96-0.33
-1.63%
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps Z

FFMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMH and PONT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMH and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMH
1D Price
Change %
FFMH100%
-0.11%
PONT - FFMH
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSBX - FFMH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWBC - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
NBGRY - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
PFIS - FFMH
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More

PONT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PONT has been loosely correlated with BPHLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PONT jumps, then BPHLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PONT
1D Price
Change %
PONT100%
N/A
BPHLF - PONT
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSBX - PONT
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - PONT
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
FFMH - PONT
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
CNBP - PONT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More