It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFMH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBGRY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FFMH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBGRY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FFMH (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NBGRY (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
FFMH | NBGRY | FFMH / NBGRY | |
Capitalization | 176M | 13.8B | 1% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 28.348 | 99.101 | 29% |
P/E Ratio | 9.98 | 10.76 | 93% |
Revenue | 62.9M | 2.77B | 2% |
Total Cash | 24.4M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 10M | 3.7B | 0% |
FFMH | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFMH | NBGRY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago35% | 3 days ago47% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago34% | 3 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago39% | 3 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago37% | 3 days ago50% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago58% | 7 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago31% | 3 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago24% | 3 days ago60% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
EWZ | 29.71 | 0.47 | +1.61% |
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | |||
QCON | 47.92 | N/A | N/A |
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | |||
TXXI | 50.74 | N/A | N/A |
Bondbloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF | |||
LOUP | 76.00 | -0.49 | -0.64% |
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | |||
GUG | 15.76 | -0.17 | -1.07% |
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMH and PONT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMH and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FFMH | 100% | N/A | ||
PONT - FFMH | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
VALIF - FFMH | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MCB - FFMH | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
CWBC - FFMH | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.53% | ||
NBGRY - FFMH | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBGRY and FFMH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBGRY and FFMH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBGRY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NBGRY | 100% | -2.04% | ||
FFMH - NBGRY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FBTT - NBGRY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
MBIN - NBGRY | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
BLFY - NBGRY | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
OBT - NBGRY | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.45% | ||
More |