FFMH
Price
$43.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
GSBX
Price
$26.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMH vs GSBX

Header iconFFMH vs GSBX Comparison
Open Charts FFMH vs GSBXBanner chart's image
First Farmers & Merchants
Price$43.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$600
CapitalizationN/A
Golden State Ban
Price$26.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.72K
Capitalization3.28M
FFMH vs GSBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMH vs. GSBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMH is a Buy and GSBX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMH: $43.00 vs. GSBX: $26.50)
Brand notoriety: FFMH and GSBX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMH: 29% vs. GSBX: 243%
Market capitalization -- FFMH: $0 vs. GSBX: $3.28M
FFMH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. GSBX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSBX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFMH and GSBX are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GSBX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSBX is a better buy in the short-term than FFMH.

Price Growth

FFMH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.38% price change this week, while GSBX (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMH YTD gains are higher at: 24.606 vs. GSBX (-4.374).
FFMHGSBXFFMH / GSBX
CapitalizationN/A3.28M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.606-4.374-563%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMH vs GSBX: Fundamental Ratings
FFMH
GSBX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3814
SMR RATING
1..100
4250
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3031
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBX's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMH (65). This means that GSBX’s stock grew similarly to FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

GSBX's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMH (38). This means that GSBX’s stock grew similarly to FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBX (50). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to GSBX’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBX (52). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to GSBX’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBX (31). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to GSBX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMHGSBX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
17%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEN24.820.10
+0.40%
Franklin Resources
SHPH3.83N/A
N/A
Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc
IMUX1.07N/A
N/A
Immunic
TALO8.79-0.09
-1.01%
Talos Energy
CLNE2.10-0.06
-2.78%
Clean Energy Fuels Corp

FFMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMH and PONT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMH and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMH
1D Price
Change %
FFMH100%
N/A
PONT - FFMH
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSBX - FFMH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWBC - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
NBGRY - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
PFIS - FFMH
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More

GSBX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBX has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSBX jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBX
1D Price
Change %
GSBX100%
N/A
OTPBF - GSBX
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FFBW - GSBX
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSVB - GSBX
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PONT - GSBX
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCBC - GSBX
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More