FFMH
Price
$43.87
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
175.36M
FINN
Price
$13000.00
Change
-$200.00 (-1.52%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMH vs FINN

Header iconFFMH vs FINN Comparison
Open Charts FFMH vs FINNBanner chart's image
First Farmers & Merchants
Price$43.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization175.36M
First National of Nebraska
Price$13000.00
Change-$200.00 (-1.52%)
Volume$5
Capitalization3.52B
FFMH vs FINN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMH vs. FINN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMH is a Buy and FINN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMH: $43.87 vs. FINN: $13000.00)
Brand notoriety: FFMH and FINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMH: 4% vs. FINN: 87%
Market capitalization -- FFMH: $175.36M vs. FINN: $3.52B
FFMH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $175.36M. FINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFINN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FINN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMH is a better buy in the long-term than FINN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FINN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FINN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFMH is a better buy in the short-term than FINN.

Price Growth

FFMH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.85% price change this week, while FINN (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FINN($3.52B) has a higher market cap than FFMH($175M). FFMH has higher P/E ratio than FINN: FFMH (9.95) vs FINN (8.47). FFMH YTD gains are higher at: 27.128 vs. FINN (7.251). FFMH has less debt than FINN: FFMH (10M) vs FINN (534M).
FFMHFINNFFMH / FINN
Capitalization175M3.52B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.1287.251374%
P/E Ratio9.958.47117%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash25.6MN/A-
Total Debt10M534M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMH vs FINN: Fundamental Ratings
FFMH
FINN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3775
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3728
SMR RATING
1..100
503
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4966
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FINN's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMH (67). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMH (37). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMH (50). This means that FINN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FINN (51). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to FINN’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FINN (66). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to FINN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMHFINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIDDX75.060.41
+0.55%
T. Rowe Price International Discovery I
CADPX22.030.03
+0.14%
Columbia International Div Inc Inst2
SGHIX11.67N/A
N/A
Saturna Global High Income
GAUIX5.86-0.01
-0.17%
Gabelli Utilities I
TSVCX10.87-0.09
-0.82%
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value C

FFMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMH and PONT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMH and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMH
1D Price
Change %
FFMH100%
N/A
PONT - FFMH
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSBX - FFMH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWBC - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
NBGRY - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
PFIS - FFMH
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
More

FINN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FINN and HACBY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FINN and HACBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FINN
1D Price
Change %
FINN100%
-1.52%
HACBY - FINN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLST - FINN
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
FFMR - FINN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FINN
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
FFMH - FINN
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More